Page 7 - VOL29_N_75_2017
P. 7

As can be seen from the above tables, in Group A cords disappeared within two months in 90% of the patients with Grade 0 and 1 AWS; patients with G2 and G3 AWS also showed a greater reduction of symptom intensity (hypofunction, pain, tightness, cords visibility) compared to the control group.
Group A also shows reduced incidence of local inflammation, improved scar healing and faster resolution of pain compared to the control group. Regarding side effects, 30% of the women in group A complained about having a hard time taking too many drops, capsules and tablets.
After two months of close observation, patients still suffering from cording symptoms underwent manual treatments such as dissection of the scar, mobilization of the clavicle and shoulder, acupressure, laser therapy and taping (13).
We did not use the stretching movements and rupture of the cords that plastic and reconstruction surgeons implement in other breast units to decrease tension in the arm extension, since our experience shows these can lead to repercussions in fibrotic networks sometimes combined with transient lymphatic stasis. The gentle approach of manual lymph drainage, implemented with non-standard methods (some therapists followed the Leduc method, others the Vodder method, others still a personalized method) proved more suitable compared to the traumatic manual rupture of the cords.
A psychomotor and psychological approach by dedicated therapists was required for those patients showing significant sensory-motor and haptic (tactile and exploration) weakness. Women themselves stated that when they were diagnosed cancer, it had been a dramatic and all-involving experience.
G2 and G3 cording, still present after two months, required a cyclic motor and manual rehabilitation therapy and constant clinical follow-up, especially for patients who had undergone chemotherapy and showed moderate to severe anxiety-depression disorders.
CONCLUSIONS
Quadrantectomy and SLNB, which is considered a low invasive and side effect-free technique, often results in outcomes that might escape regular breast screening. We tend to forget that this operation affects the body of women who have been shocked by cancer diagnoses.
Incision of the skin and the fascia can indeed lead to an increase in reactivity of fibroblast adhesion, of reticular and collagen fibers and consequent hardening of cords that affect the arm and / or chest. Such incision is often made in patients showing sensory- motor and haptic changes in the upper limb.
Sensory-motor alterations caused by the trauma of diagnosis and by the symbolic value of the operation, as well as pre-surgery fascial tightness should encourage breast specialists to carry out further research and develop preventive protocols aimed at solving local, systemic and emotional traumas.
AWS in breast cancer is not a simple injury resulting from the scalpel cutting through the connective area. It involves the different vision and emotions of women about the tumor and tightness in their arm that suddenly no longer interacts with the world.
Breast specialists and rehab therapists shall have to consider carefully the deep meanings that cancer arouses in women
and then assess the outcome which in turn leads to other emotional implications. They have to combine anti- inflammatory
and mesenchyme-draining therapies with mood-stabilizing
and anti-anxiety treatments, planning manual and perceptual-motor rehabilitation.
REFERENCES
11. Godard H., Martino G.: Motion ed e-motion. In: “Manuale di Oncologia in Psicooncologia”. Masson, Milano, 2001, pag. 875-81.
12. Martino G.: Prevenzione e terapia degli esiti. In: Veronesi U., Luini A., Costa A., Andreoli C. “Manuale di Senologia Oncologica. Milano, Masson, 1999, pag. 555-65.
13. Martino G., Godard H., Nava M., Benson J.: Breast reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps: biomechanical aspects. In: Querci della Rovere G. “Oncoplastic and recostructive Surgery of the Breast”. Taylor&Francis, London e NewYork, 2004, pag. 141-49.
14. Martino G.: Sequele dei trattamenti chirurgici: significato, prevenzione e cura. In: Modena S., “Trattato di Senologia”, Piccin Nuova Libraria, Padova, 2006, pag. 823-38.
15. Martino G., Godard H.: Il dis - agio in senologia oncologica. Ed. Metis, Milano, 2014.
16. Moskovitz A.H., Anderson B.O., Yeung R.S., Byrd D.R., Lawton T.J., Moe R.E.: Axillary web syndrome after axillary dissection. Am J Surg., 2001; 181(5): 434-9.
17. Leduc O., Sichere M., Moreau A., Rigolet J., Tinlot A., Darc S., Wilputte F., Strapart J., Parijs T., Clément A., Snoeck T., Pastouret F., Leduc A.: Axillary web syndrome: nature and localiation. Lymphology, 2009 Dec, 42(4): 176-81.
18. Leidenius M. et al.: Motion restriction and axillary web syndrome after sentinel node biopsy and axillary clearance in breast cancer. Amer J Surg., 2003, 185: 127-30.
19. Veronesi U., Paganelli G., Viale G., Luini A., Zurrida S., Galimberti V., Intra M., Veronesi P., Robertson C., Maisonneuve P., Renne G., De Cicco C., De Lucia F., Gennari R.: A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med., 2003; 349: 546-53.
10. V eronesi U., Galimberti V ., Mariani L., Gatti G., Paganelli G., Viale G., Zurrida S., Veronesi P., Intra M., Gennari R., Rita Vento A., Luini A., Tullii M., Bassani G., Rotmensz N.: Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: early results in 953 patients with negative sentinel node biopsy and no axillary dissection. Eur J Cancer, 2005; 41: 231-37.
11. Zavagno G., De Salvo G.L., Scalco G., Bozza F., Barutta L., Del Bianco P., Renier M., Racano C., Carraro P., Nitti D.: A randomized clinical trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: results of the sentinella/GIVOM trial. Ann Surg. 2008; 247: 207-13.
12. Wernicke A.G., Goodman R.L., Turner B.C., Komarnicky L.T., Curran W.J., Christos P.J., Khan I., Vandris K., Parashar B., Nori D., Chao K.S.C.: A 10-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in patients with early stage breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes treated with tangential breast irradiation following sentinel lymph node dissection or axillary clearance. Am. J. Cl. Oncol., Feb. 2013, 36.
13. Josenhans E.: Physiotherapeutic treatment for axillary cord formation following breast cancer surgery. Pt_Zeitschrift für Physiotherapeuten, 2007; 59(9): 868-78.
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LYMPHOLOGY - Vol. XXIX - Nr. 75 - 2017
3


































































































   5   6   7   8   9